Labour Bytes

THE RIGHT TO ANNUAL INCREASES

Does an employee have a right to an annual increase?

Read more...

SKILLS DEVELOPMENT MANDATORY GRANTS DEADLINE 30 JUNE 2013

We wish to remind employers that the 30 June 2013 deadline for the submission of your Annual Training Report (ATR) and Workplace Skills Plan (WSP) to the relevant SETA’s is fast approaching.

Read more...

NEW MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE AND OTHER AMENDMENTS IN WHOLESALE & RETAIL SECTOR

The minimum wage rates in the Wholesale and Retail are increased as from 1 February 2013. There are also a few other amendments to the Sectoral Determination that employers need to note.

Read more...

FORFEITURE OF ANNUAL LEAVE

Question: Can annual leave be forfeited?

Read more...

THE IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS

A study showed that 80% of employees were dissatisfied with the performance appraisal system. Many managers also find it an extremely stressful process, so why not just do away with performance appraisals?

Read more...

Latest Articles

MAY AN EMPLOYEE WITHDRAW A RESIGNATION?

May an employee withdraw a notice of termination and must the employer accept the withdrawal? And is there a distinction between desertion and resignation without proper notice?

[...]

CLAIMING FOR SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CLARIFIED

It is a misconception that companies can only be reimbursed for training provided by external SETA-registered institutions. Companies can in fact also be reimbursed for structured internal, day to day training as well as Learnerships offered.

[...]

IMPACT OF AMENDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT

The Bill seeks to rectify anomalies and clarify uncertainties that have arisen out from the interpretation of the EEA in the past decade. We will also see the expansion of the powers of the Labour Inspectorate and the jurisdiction of the CCMA.

[...]

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES COMING TO BBBEE LEGISLATION

The DTI recently published a number of proposed amendments to the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Act for comment, which if implemented will have a significant impact on organisations, making it more onerous to retain or improve their ratings.

[...]

EMPLOYEES WHO REFUSE TO SIGN A CONTRACT

Generally an employee may not be dismissed for refusing to sign a contract of employment. But are there circumstances where the employer can take stronger action short of dismissal?

[...]

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE LRA AMENDMENT BILL

Finally we have clarity about the nature of the forthcoming amendments to the LRA and BCEA.

[...]

HOW SERIOUS IS THE TRADE UNION THREAT?

When a trade union approaches an employer with the news that its employees have joined the union, one can understand that some employers might experience a sense of betrayal. But is it as bad as it seems?

[...]

RETIREMENT AGE – THE EMPLOYER’S CHALLENGE

Our law does not provide for a national or general age at which employees have to, or may retire. Contracts of employment may of course contain an agreed retirement age, in which case the employer may ask the employee to leave employment once he or she has reached the agreed age. This is obviously subject [...]

[...]

TRASHING YOUR BOSS ON FACEBOOK

Social networks, such as Facebook, serve as a useful vehicle for sharing one’s personal views. It can also have unexpected and unfortunate ramifications. One example is when an employee makes use of a social network to air his views about his or her employer.

[...]

PROTECTING WITNESSES IN DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS

What does one do with whistleblowers who refuse to testify in a disciplinary hearing because they fear intimidation?

[...]


PAYING EMPLOYEES A “FLAT RATE”

Question: May an employer pay its employees a “flat rate” (e.g. including pay for overtime worked, work on Sundays and public holidays, annual leave, sick leave, family responsibility leave)?

Answer: It is possible, in principle, for employers and employees to agree to the payment of a rate that includes annual leave pay (i.e. paying for leave in advance), as there is nothing in the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) that specifically precludes the parties from doing so. The employees would then still be entitled to take leave, but it would be unpaid. The situation is rather uncertain when it comes to an all-inclusive rate for other aspects, such as sick leave, family responsibility leave, overtime, work on Sundays and public holidays.

Brief explanation: The attraction of paying an all-inclusive rate lies in its simplicity. The Labour Court (Minny & another v Smart Plan, 2009) has on occasion sanctioned leave pay being paid as part of an all-inclusive rate. The court concluded that, in principle, an employer would not contravene the BCEA if it contracted with an employee to pay for annual leave as part of an inclusive rate, where the leave is effectively paid for in advance (In this case the employees failed with a claim for leave pay to be paid after termination of their services. If they had still been employed, the employees would not have been be entitled to pay when they took their annual leave).

Sweeping contractual provisions that refer to a rate which also includes other aspects of remuneration, such as pay for sick leave, family responsibility leave, overtime, work on Sundays and public holidays may be viewed as being contrary to the objects of the BCEA. It is possible to fashion an agreement that includes some of these aspects, but this should be done with caution: At the very least, the employer must be transparent about what the all-inclusive pay comprises and employees must be made aware of their rights in terms the BCEA (or relevant Sectoral Determination or Bargaining Council). The employer must ensure that the total amount the employee receives is no less favourable than the employee would have received if these rights accrued normally in terms of the BCEA, Sectoral Determination or Bargaining Council. This would be difficult to demonstrate unless there is a comparative norm, such as past practice within the company or a prescribed minimum wage.

While paying an all-inclusive rate might be possible in some instances, this is not an area that an employer should venture into without having obtained advice from an expert in the field of labour law.

Note: These snippets of information are based on frequently asked questions and will be circulated to subscribers on a regular basis. Labourwise subscribers are invited to submit questions on matters that they believe would be of general interest to employers.

Disclaimer: The material above is provided for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Neither the author nor the publisher accepts responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from reliance on information contained in this article.

 

2 Comments

  1. Jan Truter
    Posted 25 May 2012 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    Response to Peter: The point of departure is that overtime rate has to be paid for overtime worked. However, the BCEA makes provision for a deviation from this provision if the parties agree that time be given off in lieu of overtime. In your case it is not clear exactly what the agreement is. That would have to be established in order to provide a proper answer to your question.

  2. Peter Venter
    Posted 25 May 2012 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    If an agreement was made by the company director to pay for overtime worked although the conditions of service stipulate that time off must be taken can a manager overturn this rule 4 years down the line?

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
*